Errors that should have been caught prior to layout, where they are easily corrected, ended up causing costly design re-spins. These errors typically caused failures that require lab debugging time to identify the root cause. They often remained undetected until the prototyping phase.
#SIMPLE PCB DESIGN SOFTWARE MANUAL#
Schematic errors that got past the manual review went into PCB layout. This manual process became unwieldy for bigger designs. In the past, peer reviews done before PCB layout worked reasonably well for simple designs on a single PCB. These modern approaches provide significant benefits for both design engineers and engineering project managers. To reduce reliance on experts, the trend is to provide analysis tools that engineers who are non-specialists can use within their familiar design authoring environment. It takes a modern, automated verification approach to catch schematic errors at the source. It is easy for the complicated PCBs of today to contain a number of subtle errors that escape the notice even of experts in a traditional manual peer review process.
![simple pcb design software simple pcb design software](https://www.quick-pcba.com/uploadfile/2020/01/08/20200108112235HYJFco.jpg)
A point to note is that there are manual peer-reviews after each of these procedures. Next comes a prototype board that undergoes a reliability check before the design hits manufacturing. The next step often takes place on a new product introduction (NPI) platform that handles PCB design-to-manufacturing handoffs. The traditional board design process usually starts with a schematic that gets turned into a PCB layout.